Wagner Spraytech 0518080 Control Spray Max Corded Hvlp Paint Sprayer, 120 Vac, 5 A, 510 W, 80 Cfm, 2.7 Psi, 19 L D by 12-Inch H, Multicolor

I bought this quite awhile back (a little over a year ago), so I have used this item a lot. I now have a more expensive (10X the cost) HVLP rig, but I have found that this little Wagner gun is so MUCH more VERSATILE and EASIER to use, that I use this one more often than the expensive one. I can spray oil-based paints and primers, as well as water-based products, with hardly any effort. Cleaning up is fast and easy, too. You CAN get a 100% perfect, professional finish IF you take your time, read and re-read the manual, and you practice with it, first. Do not expect to pull it out of the box, fill it, spray with it, and have perfect results. I suggest that you gather lots of cardboard and buy a can (quart or gallon) of cheap paint (the same type as your first project requires (water- or oil-based)). Then, buy the appropriate diluent (read the paint can), the compatible additive (i.e., Penetrol for oil-based paints and Floetrol for water-based paints). While you're at the paint store (or you are on Amazon.com) pick up some medium size (pertaining to particle filtration size, not overall size) disposable paint filters. My two spray painting mantras are, "Practice does make perfect!" and "Paint additives can make ALL THE DIFFERENCE IN THE WORLD between a professional-looking paint job, and just an awful looking paint job!" That's it in a nutshell, but I've written at length about the first time I used this sprayer. If what I learned can help you get great results on your first project, it may be worth the time it takes to read:My first project was not the smartest one to choose as a first project to paint with a spray gun. It was the wainscoting and trim in my dining room. But, it came out so perfect, that even after a year, the glassy, smooth, sprayed surfaces still impresses me so much, I cannot believe I did them! But, back then, I didn't know any better, so I thought I would just start right in with the painting, buying the exact same paint and color (Sherwin Williams Alkyd) the installers had used. I lightly sanded all of the wainscoting and trim, as best I could, to scuff up the surfaces. I also used a liquid deglosser, since sanding detailed trim is thankless, tedious work. But, most of all, I spent a lot of time caulking (using PAINTABLE caulk) areas that had pulled apart from "settling," or that were not properly caulked by the installers in the first place. I let the caulk dry thoroughly. Actually, it was all the cracks and crevices in the joined edges of the woodwork caused by improper (or complete lack of) caulking, and some due to settling, that had caused the need to paint the trim and wainscotting.Next, I started in with the viscosity tests. I used paint thinner first, but then I read up on additives. So, I switched to using a combination of paint thinner and Penetrol (by Flood, purchased at Lowes). I can't recall the exact ratio of paint thinner to Penetrol I ended up using, but I think it would be safe to say about half and half. Of course, paint thinner was what my product called for as a thinning agent. Paint additives, like Floetrol and Penetrol, help produce a smooth, glassy finish. The additives can help make up for a multitude of sins! For example, if you did not properly adjust your air/paint flow, you could end up with a painted surface that has an orange peel texture (a common problem). If it's not too bad, the additives themselves can make that problem completely disappear! But, that's not too surprising, because one of their purposes is to reduce, or eliminate, brush marks!Once I had all of my paint thinner and Penetrol added in order to achieve an acceptable viscosity test, I was alarmed at how much I had diluted the paint! I had definitely diluted it beyond what the manufacturer had recommended (as stated on the can). Thankfully, I was worried enough that I decided to practice on some cardboard, rather than on the dining room walls, first, as I had planned on doing after reading all of the positive reviews here, thinking I could just spray the walls and get great results! And, although it didn't take long before I was able to get a nice, smooth coating on the cardboard, I am really thankful I did! I would have been scraping and sanding walls, for sure! I also stood the cardboard up vertically, like the surface I would be spraying (vertical surfaces are much harder to spray without getting drips and runs), so I could get a feel for how much paint I could apply before getting runs. It wasn't very much! I had to keep the gun moving relatively quickly. But, by then, I had to send my husband back to Sherwin-Williams for another can of paint, just to be sure I would have enough paint!Before getting to the viscosity tests, though, I had basically turned my dining room into a giant spray booth, but without an explosion-proof fan mounted in the window! I covered the windows, ceiling, and upper walls with plastic, masking off all of the edges. I also taped plastic over the two doorways, masking around all of the edges of EVERYTHING. I used thick plastic drop cloths on the floor, but I goofed by not taping them down as securely as I should have. So, I had to stop and do some clean-up and remedial taping when I saw that the air coming out of the nozzle was blowing up the edges of the plastic! Naturally, I used a respirator, and was covered head-to-toe in disposable painting attire. The air was thick with paint mist when I did paint. But, I expected that in the enclosed space. I put on a total of four coats, as I thought with all of the diluting, they would be thin coats. They were, but I wouldn't say that was a bad thing! I don't own a mill gauge (something I just recently learned about!), so I couldn't tell you how thick each coat was, but they were thick enough to cover bare wood without being transparent enough to see the wood grain show through, but not so thick that it would cause runs or drips. I always sprayed a small piece of cardboard, leaving it in the dining room, but near the opening, so I could easily check when the paint was dry enough to recoat, without touching the trim or walls themselves. It dried much quicker than I had anticipated, given all of the dilution. I did get a couple of runs, but I just sanded them off when the paint had dried enough to produce a powder when sanded, and not rub or rip. Of course, I sprayed these areas again.Even with the massive amount of prep work required (most of it would have still been required if I was brushing-on the paint, such as all of the caulking), the amount of time It took to spray, clean-up, dry, spray, clean-up, etc., was only a fraction of that time that would have been required for me to brush on all of the coats! The results were, as I said, spectacular. Today, the wainscoting and trim still look as fantastic as they did the day II had finished painting them. I was worried the dilution of the paint would have affected the wear or appearance of the surfaces, but it did not. So, I would never be afraid to dilute paint more than stated by the manufacturer on the can. Not being a paint professional, I do not know how they arrive at those figures, but for myself, I would always dilute the product according to what is recommended in the sprayer manual (using viscosity cup and timing the flow), and not what is stated on the can.But, I always read the can of the product I am using, because it tells me what to use in order to thin the product (the diluent). For oil-based PRIMERS, I use only the recommended diluent or solvent, and I omit the additive (Penetrol). To date, I have not used water-based PRIMERS, but I would probably only use distilled water for the diluent (unless the can stated to use another type of diluent, that isn't water). A shellac-based PRIMER would probably call for denatured alcohol as the diluent. Again, always defer to the can/manufacturer for the diluent to use, but defer to the sprayer manual for the proper dilution rate (using the viscosity cup). For water-based paints, I use a mixture of one part distilled water and one part Floetrol (50-50) to dilute the paint. I also use a medium filter for all paints and primers, and it is the last thing I do before I spray paint. Disposable filters are cheap, so I use a fresh, new filter when I fill or refill my sprayer cup. If I fill the cup three times during a project, I've used three filters. I always gather some cardboard to use to warm-up on, and, most importantly, to help me fine-tune the settings on the sprayer, so that I achieve the best finish possible. If your paint is properly diluted, and your spray is properly adjusted, I just don't think you will be ever be unhappy with the results. Thoroughly cleaning up your equipment as soon as you are finished painting is also extremely important. If you have a tiny, dried, speck of paint in the nozzle, you will not get good results. I have found those really thick pipe cleaners (oh, excuse me, I mean CHENILLE STEMS) are invaluable as an aid to cleaning out the inside of the slanted plastic tube that is inserted into the paint cup.Some other tips I've learned include spray painting early in the morning, when there is less likely to be a breeze, if I am painting something outside. Avoid spraying in direct sunlight, too. Finally, if there is a result that is not to your liking, Google it to find a solution to the problem. I have learned so much from doing this, and watching Youtube videos, too. If all else fails, call the manufacturer because there is always a small chance you could have a defective part that needs to be replaced.Dilute and practice with your cheap practice paint. If you can achieve a great finish on your cardboard (make sure the cardboard has a smooth surface to begin with, too!) using your cheap paint, you will surely be able to get an amazing finish with your higher quality paints and finishes.

I'm am thoroughly impressed by this sprayer after initially being skeptical of its plastic tip and prior negative experience many years ago with a Wagner HVLP Finecoat sprayer with Latex paint--granted, the Finecoat sprayer's instructions did not recommend its use for Latex house paint.But this sprayer was a pleasure to use and clean-up, when used with Latex house paint. I had a chance to compare this to the Graco 3900 Spray Station using the same batch of Sherwin Williams Pro Classic satin latex interior paint that I thinned out slightly (aprox 10%) with water and Flotrol. I eyeballed the viscosity and my guess would be it was a little on the thick side (it did not empty the viscosity cup included with the Wagner sprayer within 90 seconds); but after using the Graco SprayStation initially and using its viscosity cup at the recommended time of 180 secs for Latex, I decided that viscosity was unacceptably thin. So I just eyeballed the viscosity and tested it on the Wagner HVLP.I am remodeling our kitchen and wanted to use a sprayer to paint the cabinet doors. The difference was night and day between the two sprayers. I purchased the Graco at Lowes with a total price with tax of around $162. This Wagner I obtained via Amazon for $111. As I said, the Wagner initially put me off with the plastic spray tip compared to Graco's brass tip and the extra fine finish brass tip that the Graco came with; but after spraying the Pro Classic batch I mixed up with the Wagner, I was immediately impressed. The finish layed-on like a very good roller brush coat, with slight spitting, but it leveled out very nicely as long as you don't pan the gun too fast. I then used the same batch of paint pouring it from the Wagner's cup to the Graco's, and tried the Graco HVLP. The result wasn't good--the Graco did a lot of spitting, paint wasn't spraying smoothly, and in general, it didn't hold up to the Wagner unit. The paint would have needed more dilution using the Graco.Aside from the quality of finish, a nice feature of the Wagner HVLP was the flexibility of the air hose. The air hose feels like a rubberized plastic and flexed easily therefore making gun positioning more convenient. The Graco's hose is a stiff cheap feeling plastic. The Graco's hose also had a tendency to blow off of the connection, therefore requiring you to really torque the hose into place since it is a friction fit. It blew off on me 4 times during my spray session. The Wagner for whatever reason, stayed connected and did not require excessive force to ensure a good friction fit.Although the Graco SprayStation 3900 included a 1 gallon backpack paint container as a bonus, I did not find that useful for the paint needed to be diluted more than when using the cup. The Wagner on the other hand, came with an aluminum cup and a larger plastic cup which I find more useful.The operation of the Wagner's spray gun seemed smoother probably because of its all plastic construction. The Graco's gun operation feels gritty by comparison. I do like the way you can adjust the spray pattern easily as well as air pressure on the Graco's gun whereas on the Wagner, you adjust pressure using a dial on the pump housing and need to loosen the air cap on the gun to turn the spray nozzle for a different pattern.Both manufacturer's spray guns cleaned easily but the Wagner's I concluded is easier to clean, with less parts to disassemble. I'm extra careful with the plastic tip and needle assembly on the Wagner to ensure I don't deform it.The pump unit on both are nice, but the Wagner's unit is more aesthetically pleasing and has dual air filters whereas the Graco has only one air filter but has a a feature to store/wrap the hose on the unit itself. The power cord on the Wagner pump is heavier duty compared to Graco's.I really wanted to like the Graco unit after having very positive experiences with Graco's TrueCoat airless sprayer and experiencing Graco's excellent customer support. But this Wagner is a sure winner when it comes to budget HVLP sprayers and definitely beats brushing or rolling assuming over spray is not an issue.