Complete Josef Hofmann 1
D**M
Great historical testament to an incredible pianist
Josef Hofmann's piano technique is so effortless that it really needs to be heard to be believed. This CD is a historical recording and a great testament to the musician. The sound was much better than I had anticipated. The interview, while not adding much to the value, was still very interesting to hear. The final short selection, which is a snippet from the 1st concerto from a BBC shortwave broadcast, has absolutely terrible sound but Hofmann's brilliant playing is even more evident than in the full concertos.A must buy for all Hofmann fans and lovers of classical piano.
J**D
Some familiarity with the music wouldn't hurt.
What can be said? A master pianist who was fortunately able to be recorded in the early days of the phonograph.
J**N
Which Hofmann?
Hofmann - particularly late Hofmann - may be an acquired taste.Despite having been the protégé of Anton Rubinstein, "the wonderful boy" was recognized from quite an early age as the exemplar of a modern style of playing - textually faithful, eschewing swooning or bombast. (See, for example, the references to Hofmann in Henry Lahee's wonderful survey from 1900, Famous Pianists of Today and Yesterday.)Still, a number of younger colleagues expressed ambivalence. Horowitz was floored by Hofmann's keyboard command - everyone was - but he, Artur Rubinstein and Arrau, to name just three - seem not to have been terribly moved by Hofmann's musicianship.But which Hofmann are we considering? His playing for the gramophone - as early as 1903 and as late as 1935 - was as disciplined as it was imaginative and dazzling. The late Harold Schonberg called it "perfection plus."However, as Gregor Benko makes clear in his essays for the Marston reissues, Hofmann switched on what the pianist called a "spectacular" style for many public performances. This may sound cynical. Often it sounds terribly cynical. Hofmann was not speaking merely of the need to project in a large concert hall. In public performance - at least those performances we have from the late `30s and early `40s - the aristocrat often becomes a mountebank, lurching from the softest pianissimos to explosive fortissimos, rattling off passages or entire pieces even faster than Simon Barere boasted he could do.Schonberg - and Hofmann's friend and admirer Rachmaninoff - reminded us that during this period Hofmann had many personal troubles, including a severe drinking problem. We must believe that at his greatest Hofmann played as scrupulously and with as much refined feeling in public as he did on many of his studio recordings, though his manner may have differed somewhat. And there are some marvelous live performances. The Rubinstein 4th from his Golden Jubilee concert beggars description.So where does that leave us? As an introduction to Hofmann, I would recommend the early Columbia recordings, those he made somewhat later for Brunswick, and the American and British test pressings from 1935 - perhaps his greatest recorded playing. These are Volumes 3, 4 and 5 of the complete Hofmann series. Serious listeners will also want the ups and downs of the Golden Jubilee (Volume 2). The Chopin concertos in Volume 1 have some splendid moments, but the superlative (not spectacular; superlative) performance there is a fragment of the first movement of the E minor concerto performed in London -- far more poised and committed than its counterpart from New York. (I wonder if Hofmann played differently in America than he did in Europe? Some musicians - for instance, Mahler, Toscanini, Bernstein - for varying reasons apparently did.)Having said all this, the entire Hofmann series is priceless. Heartfelt thanks to Gregor Benko and Ward Marston for making it available in superb transfers with fascinating notes.
R**N
Josef Hofmann -- a Treat
Josef Hofmann is considered by many the supreme pianist of the century, especially in Chopin, but he left very few recordings. This CD (Vol 1) and the Golden Jubilee Recital (Vol 2) are the best examples of his art. Expect piano playing that is stunning, even captured with 1930's sound. Tempos are fast -- #1 goes by in 34 minutes (compared to Rubinstein's 40 minutes or Zimerman's 46 minutes). If you've never heard Hofmann, you have a treat in store for you. If you have already heard Hofmann, then you don't need this review!
A**R
Virtuose
Certainement un des meilleurs pianistes entre 1900-1950
Trustpilot
1 day ago
1 month ago