Accu-ShotBT46-LW17 PSR Atlas Bipod with ADM-170-S, Multicolor

Expensive bipod, but by far the best, most solid, I’ve ever purchased,.

I hate that it’s so expensive but it’s the best bipod I’ve ever owned. It’s built well and does what it’s supposed to. Def recommend

Bought this for my fiance as a gift and he absolutely loved it! Works very well and easy to install/use.

This item has tight tolerances, little to no play, sturdy, light, sexy, and overall functions very well. It's beautiful piece of craftsmanship and a testament to the creator. Thank you. I thought I wouldn't like that you have to operate the legs independently of each other and they don't deploy as quickly as the harris bipods, but I think the atlas bipods are very practical in their functionality and it also contributes to it's lighter weight. Of course the cost of this unit is seemingly unrealistically high, but all in all knowing what it would take to produce this item with such quality and potentially not on a production line... would make sense.

I balked at spending this much on a bipod, but it was worth the money! Genuine factory product

I noticed the position pins and plates weren't tapered like in the photos on the B&T website, meaning the legs have a small amount of play when locked into each position. B&T customer service confirmed they "...switched to square pins and plates to have better engagement for reliability so you will not experience any rolled plates in the future that will cause the leg to slip into the next position." I can see how this change would make it stronger (and easier to manufacture). Compared to my plastic Magpul bipod, this bipod is very rigid. My only complaint is the tensioning knob is pretty useless. By comparison, the Magpul knob allows you to get a very good grip with your thumb and forefinger, and effectively locks down the bipod from pan and cant, whereas on the B&T bipod, you can still rotate and cant the rifle as if the knob wasn't tightened enough. There's only about a 1/2 turn between "tight" and loose, and tight isn't enough. Seems like this part of it could use a redesign. And a minor cosmetic note: The ADM mount silk screen was shifted/ghosted, like they slipped during application. Overall, still very functional. See pictures.

I have had two Harris Bipods before purchasing the Atlas. They are my only basis for comparisonPros for the Atlas:1). It is lighter and more rugged.2) For shooting at the range the Atlas is stronger and allows more consistent loading.3) it looks great. There are no springs to catch on bushes or clothes.The cons mostly relate to hunting.Cons1) it is slower than the Harris. The legs on the Harris deploy together to 90 degrees. This allows the legs to be quickly extended with one hand without taking your eyes off the target. The Atlas requires pushing a button and rotating the legs one at a time to one of several defined positions. This requires some concentration.2) The Atlas legs require more attention to extend. The legs on the Harris are spring loaded. Press a button and a leg will extend all the way. The weight of the rifle can then be used to set the correct height.3) The Atlas allows the legs to be deployed at several angles. I am sure there must be a time this would be useful but I can’t imagine what it would be.4) The Atlas does not allow locking of can’t or rotation. That is not a big deal. The problem is one knob controls tension on both. In order to get my preferred tension on cant, the rotation is so tight that the legs move when I rotate. The bipod is new, time and use may solve the problem.

Worth every cent. If you want the best, this is it. Form and function are flawless. Used another bipod for years, this is 21st Century perfection.You won't be sorry.